« this is it... | Main | missional church...iv »

two...

So, I've been reading through the great chapters of the Bible (more on that some other time...maybe) and I've just finished reading about THE great redemptive event of the OT: the Exodus from Egypt. I found it interesting that there are two "memorials" associated with this event: Passover and The Feast of Unleavened Bread.

I began thinking about THE great redemptive event of the NT: the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Interestingly enough, there are two "memorials" associated with this event: The Lord's Supper and Baptism.

The Lord's Supper obviously corresponds to Passover. What does Baptism correspond to?

Posted on Wednesday, July 16, 2008 by Registered Commenterfr'nklin in | Comments11 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (11)

Maybe the parting of the Red Sea?
July 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDavid C
Hey David...good to see you again. I hope all is well. The Red Sea is an interesting comment. Actually, the Red Sea is mentioned in the NT in correspondence to Baptism - 1 Cor. 10:1-3. Some might suggest that Baptism corresponds to the Israelites passing through the Red Sea.

I was actually thinking in another direction...
July 17, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterfranklin
Off the top of my head, I thought of the Red Sea as well. I'll have to think some more.
July 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterFred
Maybe circumcision? They are identifiers with the people of God.
July 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterFred
Okay, here was my thinking:

Two memorials in the OT that correspond to the Greatest OT redemptive event (the Exodus): Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread.

Two memorials in the NT that correspond to the Greatest NT redemptive event (cross & resurrection): Lords Supper and Baptism.

If the Lord's Supper corresponds to Passover...then why wouldn't Baptism correspond to the Feast of Unleavened Bread.

I mean, one could make the case that the Feast of Unleavened Bread is ultimately about purity in that leaven is often associated with Sin and Baptism...if it stands for nothing else symbolizes the washing away of our sins. Further, they didn't put leaven in the bread because they didn't want to be slowed down...as sin weighs us down and entangles us.

I'm just wondering...it seems like an obvious connection and yet, I don't think I've ever heard it. The implications for the meaning of Baptism and what it corresponds to are interesting.
July 17, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterfranklin
I think I see what you are saying. I'd never heard it that way either.
July 18, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterFred
The liturgy in the UM Hymnal, the Episcopal BCP and others basically lists several different water illusions:

1-The nurturing water of the womb.
2-The parting of the Red Sea (and God's salvation of Israel as a direct result).
3-The baptism of Christ.

I like this "trinity" of illusions for the following reasons:

1-Water is necessary to life.
2-Water takes on many different forms and shapes.
3-Christ was obedient in baptism.

As a sacrament, I believe God works through baptism to show us a tanglble sign of new birth.
July 21, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDan Keller
Hey Dan, good to hear from you. You know, I certainly like that imagery as well. I'm just wondering why I've never seen anyone connect Baptism to the feast of unleavened bread. Probably for one of the reasons you suggest here...there is no WATER used in that feast. However, during that feast time (it was a 7 day feast) they did pass through the waters of the dead sea.

So, the water of the Red sea coupled with the purification suggested by not having leaven could strengthen the connection of the feast with Baptism.

Here's the thing: some denominations readily connect baptism to circumcision. It seems to me that this feast is a much clearer correspondence to Baptism than circumcision. Why does it get overlooked?
July 22, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterfranklin
I just realized what looks different over "here". YOU FOUND YOUR "a" IN YOUR NAME!

Why'd you drop the apostrophe?
July 23, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterregine
Well...when I turned 42 I felt older...but when I turned 43...I knew I wasn't hip enough to have a cool name. I like my A and wanted it back...;)

You are the FIRST person to notice! I need to give you some kind of prize or something.
July 23, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterfranklin
Thank GAWD you never picked up a pair of oh-so-hip-and-trendy glasses (you didn't, did you??); it might hurt to trade them in for CVS readers (and shave the goatee in penance, too).

Strangely, you wanting your A back reminded me of P Diddy...and (the artist formerly known as) Prince, and maybe most bizarre of all, Justin Timberlake (he never lost letters, apparently just his "sexy"). Yeah, I said it was strange.

Mostly I commented again because I heard someone mentioning a prize. I'm waiting!

:)
July 26, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterregine

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.